'Enduring Consolations'
Dr David James
(Queen Mary, University of London)
6-8pm, Wednesday 23rd January
Senate House, Room G35 (Ground Floor)
In a now often-quoted NYRB essay contrasting Joseph O’Neill
with Tom McCarthy, Zadie Smith raised a number of concerns about the prevalence
of what she termed ‘lyrical realism’ in the novel today, a mode that she
herself had previously adopted (in On Beauty)
but which nowadays she regards with some suspicion for its susceptibility to
nostalgia and for its propensity to comfort readers. This tendency for lyrical
realism to offer forms of solace is doubly damaging when the writer in question
is dealing with matters of terrorism, war and trauma – as O’Neill does in Netherland. And Smith therefore
concluded that while she ‘has written in this tradition and cautiously hope[s]
for its survival’, she maintained that ‘if it’s to survive, lyrical realists
will have to push a little harder on their subject’. But what does pushing
harder entail? Smith seems to suggest that it means refusing what Iris Murdoch famously
saw as the false consolations of form – the smoothing away of difficult issues
by means of a highly wrought, consciously artistic language.
This paper returns
to Murdoch’s contention, originally set out in ‘Against Dryness’ (1961) in
order to call into question those reservations about consolation that appear to
unite Murdoch and Smith across time. In re-evaluating both the pertinence and
pitfalls of Murdoch’s notoriously schematic distinction between ‘journalistic’
and ‘crystalline’ registers of modern fiction, the talk traces the re-emergence
– or what could be described as a ‘renaissance’ – of the latter mode, bringing
together writers as different as Paul Harding, Colum McCann, Ian McEwan, and
O’Neill himself. Charting their respective renovations of crystalline
narration, the paper delineates a shared impulse to synchronize the consolatory
force of form with a more interrogative, reflexive, and dynamic sense of
fiction’s capacity to stage ethical scenarios and invite politically responsive
readings.
Suggested preparatory reading
Iris
Murdoch, ‘Against Dryness: A Polemical
Sketch’ (1961), repr. in
The Novel Today,
ed. Bradbury (London: Fontana, 1977), 23–31. (Available online
here.)
Zadie Smith, ‘Two Directions for
the Novel’, in
Changing My Mind:
Occasional Essays (London: Hamish Hamilton, 2009), 71–96. (Available online
here.)
David James teaches modern and
contemporary literature in the Department of English at Queen Mary, University
of London. He is author of Contemporary
British Fiction and the Artistry of Space (2008), and, most recently, of Modernist Futures (Cambridge University
Press, 2012). He has edited a volume of essays The Legacies of Modernism (Cambridge University Press, 2011), and
guest-edited a special issue of Contemporary
Literature on ‘Post-Millennial Commitments’ (due out in February). With
Matthew Hart and Rebecca L. Walkowitz, he edits the book series Literature Now for Columbia University
Press. He is currently editing The
Cambridge Companion to British Fiction since 1945.
All are welcome to attend.