Our fourth session will take place on Thursday 25th March in room GSB2, 2 Gower Street, between 1 and 3pm. We will be looking at an extract from Slavoj Žižek's First As Tragedy, Then As Farce (London: Verso, 2009).
Discussion points will be as follows:
- Is it ideology, stupid?
- Within global capitalism, is choice ever choice at all?
- 'The best indicator of the Left's lack of trust in itself is its fear of crisis.' Do you agree?
- How can critical theory and/or literature respond to crisis?
21/03/2010
02/03/2010
Third Session: Ecocriticism
Our third session will take place on Thursday 11th March in room GSB2, 2 Gower Street, between 1 and 3pm. The texts that we will be discussing are as follows:
- Chapter 1 of Ursula K. Heise's Sense of Place and Sense of Planet: The Environmental Imagination of the Global (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).
- Hubert Zapf's chapter, "The State of Ecocriticism and the Function of Nature as Cultural Ecology", in Catrin Gerstof and Sylvia Mayer (eds), Nature in Literary and Cultural Studies: Transatlantic Conversations on Ecocriticism (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2006).
The questions for this week's discussion are as follows:
What is ecocriticism?
Is there an over-emphasis on the concept of 'interconnectedness' in ecocriticism?
Is Heise right to suggest 'eco-cosmopolitanism' as a way of re-envisioning globalisation from an ecological perspective?
Is Heise's idea of 'deterritorialisation' the solution to the problem of the global versus the local in ecocriticism? What does this mean for literature?
- Chapter 1 of Ursula K. Heise's Sense of Place and Sense of Planet: The Environmental Imagination of the Global (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).
- Hubert Zapf's chapter, "The State of Ecocriticism and the Function of Nature as Cultural Ecology", in Catrin Gerstof and Sylvia Mayer (eds), Nature in Literary and Cultural Studies: Transatlantic Conversations on Ecocriticism (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2006).
The questions for this week's discussion are as follows:
What is ecocriticism?
Is there an over-emphasis on the concept of 'interconnectedness' in ecocriticism?
Is Heise right to suggest 'eco-cosmopolitanism' as a way of re-envisioning globalisation from an ecological perspective?
Is Heise's idea of 'deterritorialisation' the solution to the problem of the global versus the local in ecocriticism? What does this mean for literature?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)